| | Snapshot of the World—9/2007Received 3 October 2007; accepted 3 October 2007. On 9/11/ 2001, my wife and I were scheduled to attend the WFNS meeting in Sydney, Australia, and then go to a conference in Seoul, South Korea. The terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC, changed international travel and the lives of people around the world. We were unable to attend either meeting but, as others, have traveled since that time. Six years later, September 2007, we were invited to neurosurgical meetings in Hawaii, China, and Belgium and thus traveled around the world to get to those places. We have visited almost 50 different countries for more than 30 years and have learned a great deal. Fundamentally, no one culture is better than any other; we are just different. What we saw, heard, and read during our trip is the subject of this editorial: “Snapshot of the World—9/2007.” What you will read is our impression of people in the countries we visited. 1. USA  As we left the USA on September 8, the presidential campaign had been underway for months with candidates from the left and right, Democrat and Republican, presenting their positions on subjects from Iraq to Healthcare. Both parties were deeply divided on dealing with these issues. Also occurring as we left the USA, a poll on the public's feeling about the president and Congress was released. The president's performance approval rating was near a low of 29%, whereas Congressional approval was even lower, 11%; both the lowest in history [6]. The press ranked below both in another poll. So, everything was not perfect in the USA, a picture we would see in every country we visited. Everyone has their problems and many of the problems are the same. So as we set out on our trip we would see these issues unfold in countries across the world: government control vs individual freedom to choose; terrorism; rising healthcare costs worldwide; the excesses of Socialism and the excesses of Capitalism; and greed. 1.1. Terrorism The rise of yet another power in the world, radical Islamic fundamentalism, to limit the freedom of people around the world who do not accept its radical doctrine seems to have left little impression on many of the candidates in the USA or in the countries we visited. The reality of the attacks on the USA, London, Spain, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, Russia, Morocco, Israel, Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan, Indonesia, India, and others seems to have been dismissed as just inconveniences travelers have experienced since 9/11. People do not seem to make a connection between the extensive searches we now undergo to protect us and the people who would kill us for our beliefs. In major cities in the USA we cannot reach the offices of many companies as their screening of visitors prevents the free traffic to the different floors of offices. How much have our freedoms been altered in 6 years? The response seems to be, “What is the loss of a little Freedom here or there?” 1.2. Healthcare, socialism, government control, individual freedom The healthcare debate in the USA focuses on more government control by the socialistic left because of its perceived failure of a healthcare system. Fifteen percent (15%) of the people in the USA reportedly do not have healthcare insurance. (That means that 85% of the population is covered by health insurance.) The leftist politicians believe that the government needs to take over the management of healthcare to fix the problem that the free market could not repair. (Was it given a chance?) People do not seem to notice that the government has failed to solve the energy crisis for 30 years, failed to act on the impending bankruptcy of the Social Security system and Medicare, or to solve the immigration problem, which also accounts for a significant portion of the uninsured. Obviously, counter arguments can be made about the positions taken by the right favoring a free market approach to solve this issue. The facts on which this major shift to government-sponsored health insurance should take place are incorrect. Actually, many of those without health insurance are between jobs, and only a minority lack insurance for more than a year [1], [2]. During World War II, when the government froze wage increases, some companies gave health insurance to its workers as a benefit. In the subsequent years, more generous company benefits were given upon which the employee came to depend as an “entitlement,” or right, from the employer. Now the company receives a tax benefit for giving this healthcare benefit to the worker, but the company owns the insurance. So, if the worker leaves for another job, he/she cannot take the insurance with them, except in the form of a temporary 18-month COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) insurance coverage which is expensive. The premiums to buy individual health insurance is very high and not tax deductible, and in many cases unaffordable. In 1964, the US Government passed the Medicare bill providing health insurance, at the tax payer's expense, to all over the age of 65, whether they needed it or not, a major step in government control of medicine and the loss of individual freedom of choice. The candidates on the left do not mention that the government cost of Medicare has exceeded the projections 40 years earlier by many multiples, that the Medicare system will be bankrupt by 2019 [3], that doctors' pay has been reduced from 80 cents for a dollar charged to 20 cents, and that as more doctors find this pay insufficient to offset their expenses, they are refusing to care for those with government-sponsored insurance in increasing numbers, or that rising malpractice costs reduce doctors' earnings. But more on these subjects as our travels unfold. 1.3. Financial issues; subprime mortgage crisis; greed One other issue was in the news as we left on our journey: “the sub prime mortgage crisis.” At a time when the US and world economies were in recession because of 9/11 and other issues, banks backed by governments lowered the cost of borrowing money for mortgages, allowing many to buy homes. The prices of homes escalated with the increasing demand. Speculators bought homes as investments. Apparently, many who did not have good enough credit received loans, called “subprime” loans to purchase homes. These loans were backed by money from wealthy investors, banks, and hedge funds speculating that they would receive a huge return on their investment from the higher interest rates being paid by these poor risk borrowers. However, as interest rates rose, the new homeowners could not pay the rising cost of the mortgages and defaulted on and surrendered their homes to the loan agents [4]. Thus, banks and the speculators were left with homes they could not sell in a market saturated with homes for sale, and these speculators suffered heavy financial losses. Banks in many countries speculate in these “subprime” loans. Countywide, the largest provider of mortgages in the USA, and a major bank in England, Northern Rock, which obtained money for mortgages from the credit markets instead of depositors' savings accounts, was unable to sustain the financial losses. The government of England had to step in and prevent people from taking money out of Northern Rock bank [5] and eventually guaranteed all the loans the bank had made. Basically, the rich around the world gambled on an investment to make money and were losing. They cried for help from the governments to reduce the interest rates so that the housing market would be saved along with their financial losses! Greed wants it both ways. This crisis has affected economies around the world and obviously impacts healthcare costs. 2. Japan  Our plane touched down in Japan for a stop. The Japanese economy has been recovering in the past years. In the last decade Japanese banks had poor lending policies based on personal favor and not on good financial credentials. This lending process led to problems in the economy and to its slow growth. Individual citizens did not want to buy goods because they felt safer saving their money. They did not trust the government policies. During our travels the Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe, resigned after a year in office because of corruption in his party and because of his desire to support the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, a position that is not popular in Japan [7], [31]. Yet, months earlier when North Korea was threatening Southeast Asia with its development of nuclear weapons, Japan looked to the USA and others for help, a curious double standard of behavior. The New York Times in September 2007 [8] reported that Japanese women, who manage the family finances in their culture, were speculating in the currency markets and in stocks to grow the family money. The “sub prime” crisis caused the stock markets to collapse worldwide. Many of these Japanese women lost their family savings. Yes, this experience in Japan was repeated in households around the world and in the USA. The costs of healthcare in Japan are rising as everywhere with no clear answers. The government has a major influence on healthcare in Japan. 3. China  We next landed in China. Beijing, a city whose streets were clogged with bicycles 10 years ago, was now full of cars in heavy traffic. No bicycles were seen. The result of the booming Chinese economy built on the cheap labor of its 1 billion citizens made its low-cost goods attractive to consumers around the world. So as the Chinese made money, their affluence could be seen in the auto-filled roads and the new construction visible everywhere. Capitalism had penetrated Communism as each individual reached for his/her own success in life. As a result, workers in Europe, the USA, and other developed countries were losing their jobs as industries transferred their manufacturing to China. This was a scenario seen more than 2000 years ago as India dominated the world trade. Europeans at that time had a high demand for Indian cotton and dyed goods. India's production of cotton clothing commanded 25% of all world trade, putting people out of work in other countries as money flowed into India for its products—an example of Capitalism and Globalization in a world thousands of years ago [9]. So, the dominance of one economy in world trade is nothing new. But its effects on others cause real everyday problems elsewhere. Every country we visited was affected by the growth of the Chinese economy. Yet, here in China, too, there were problems. A worldwide dissatisfaction with Chinese products such as contaminated dog food and toys painted with lead-based paints led companies and consumers to reject Chinese goods in September 2007 [10], [11], [12]. The Chinese government blamed the greedy companies for making this problem while the companies blamed the Chinese manufacturers' desire to save money by producing substandard products as the cause. The Chinese government demanded an apology from a major US toy company as the issue affected its trade worldwide. The company admitted it had overreacted, but the problem did exist [13]. The Occidental world and its culture was meeting the Oriental world and its culture. The major rise in industry in China has led to pollution. A Global Warming Conference at the UN in September 2007 stated that China and the USA are the world's biggest polluters [14]. One Chinese company using cotton dyes for clothing reportedly discharged its dyes into the river near the plant polluting the water and exposing the people nearby to contamination. Companies worldwide whose goods were made in China, fearing a consumer backlash, sent teams to China to demand better environmental control [15]. For 2 days Beijing stopped car traffic as a test to reduce air pollution before the Olympics are held there in 2008; the experiment succeeded in reducing pollution. All of these issues confirm that as the country grows rapidly, it is not building the infrastructure to supervise its products or companies well. The Chinese government is working on all of these problems. The end result in the coming years will be higher prices for Chinese goods as higher wages for the Chinese worker and infrastructure costs raise the price of production of everything in China [16]. Inflation in every country in the world will result as prices for goods rise, according to a new book published during our trip by the former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan [17]. In addition, newspapers in China reported a crackdown on corruption in government [18]. A Chinese doctor told the conference I attended that more hospitals had image-guided surgical systems and endoscopes than in the previous years, but that healthcare costs were rising rapidly. Are these investments in technology a good expenditure in a country struggling to provide healthcare to its people? This key question is true in the developed and developing worlds. One of the speakers at the conference was Tuncalp Ozgen, from Turkey, who is also president of his university and a neurosurgeon. He stated that the money we are spending for all this healthcare equipment is the peoples' money and must be spent responsibly. He believes that doctors should evaluate this technology before it gains widespread use to ensure that the technology has a value for its cost. Few seemed to be listening to his ideas but were more interested in getting the new technology to “be ahead of the others,” a problem seen in the USA and elsewhere. Doctors just do not care to understand the real political issues. “What, me go into politics?” one neurosurgeon said. Seventy percent (70%) of the population in China, mostly in the rural areas, do not have insurance to pay for care and thus are without healthcare. These are the same issues faced by countries rich or poor we saw around the world. One young doctor we talked with invested his money in buying homes. He did not trust the Chinese stock market, which he believed was manipulated by the government. The people knew of reports of the banking system in China, which had loaned money to companies with little proof they were sound businesses. (Sound familiar?) Yet the stock market values were growing as those anxious to make money in and outside of China speculated on its economy. He said that many of his peers agreed with him and were skeptical of investing in the stock market. All he and his friends wanted was a chance to have the things in life they could not have because of government controls in the past, and the freedom to pursue the life they wanted. Individual freedom again is the key focus of a population long subjected to emperors, authoritarian leadership, and Communism. People want individual freedom and opportunity. In Tianjin, a coastal manufacturing city 2 hours from Beijing with a population of 11 million people, where our conference was held, we could still see people on bicycles, but the enormous growth of the city over 10 years was obvious. Luxury apartments were being built in downtown Tianjin. A newly created economic development area was rising in an area of the city, formerly just vacant fields, and was now a booming area for international corporations. Yet, even with all of this growth, the people were courteous and respectful of each other, typical of the cultures of Asia but becoming uncommon in the developed world where people have become more concerned with themselves than others. Is the greed of Capitalism reaching all levels of society and behavior? 4. Paris, France  The day we arrived in France from China, the new Prime Minister and others in the government proclaimed that, “France was bankrupt.” It could no longer afford all the social welfare programs of the past. The government had a deficit for each of the last 25 years, and this situation, they stated, was unsustainable. Later times for retirement and longer working hours were being proposed to a population now accustomed to “entitlements” by the government [19], [20], [28]. Although the powerful unions were set to oppose any changes, the people generally agreed that change was necessary according to reports in the newspapers. Socialism in France has failed. French doctors in the past have protested low pay and governmental controls in a system of socialized medicine [21]. When a hospital runs out of its allocated money, the people cannot get care. We passed by the home of former Prime Minister Jacques Chirac, who is now being pursued in the courts for corruption charges relating to the time when he was Mayor of Paris before he became immune to prosecution as Prime Minister [22]. As George Orwell wrote in his book, Animal Farm, which is a satire on Socialism, “All pigs are equal but some are more equal than others” [23]. This fundamental flaw in governments' leaders who give themselves special privileges others cannot have is one of the basic flaws of Socialism, Monarchies, and dictatorships, and, yes, democracies, too. We read or saw about this corruption in Japan, China, France, England, and yes also in the USA as politicians get more powerful. 5. Other countries in Europe  5.1. Switzerland, Germany Of Switzerland, I have written that doctors protested governmental control and intrusion into healthcare, and in Germany of the socialized healthcare system suffering rising costs [21]. In Germany one third of doctors' time is spent on administrative work while physicians' pay is down [21], [38]. 5.2. Holland In Holland the costs of healthcare are also rising. Physician reimbursements have been reduced [38]. The doctors we met praised a healthcare system that “treated everyone.” The Dutch doctors were pleased with their system. Yet when asked, what happens if the allocations for hip surgery or brain surgery or other care are used up, they stated that the government would not pay for the procedures, and patients would have to wait until the funds became available. Because of their concern for their patients, doctors give the care to the patients anyway, for free. What they do not realize is that by doing this good deed, they give the politicians a strong reason not to raise payment to doctors because the politicians know the doctors will take less pay. When I pointed this fact out to the doctors, they were surprised but agreed. They felt helpless confronting the healthcare system run by politicians. As a defense for physicians' lack of protest, the fear is that politicians will make the doctors appear unconcerned about the patient and only interested in money. In reality, the politicians are the only ones interested in money and not the patient. I have seen this same situation in countries all over the world. This is a problem of public relations. Doctors do not know anything about public relations; they just want to take care of sick people. Where is the truth for the public? The truth is that the government cannot provide everything to everyone—a key fundamental principle of Socialism and politicians. So the politicians will tell the public that the doctors do not care about the patients and violate the Hippocratic Oath, rather than say that as politicians they and the government cannot do any more for the people. Doctors or their medical societies do not respond to these charges and as a result look bad in the peoples' eyes. Yet, as I pointed out to the doctors in Holland, the politicians and the government generally do not care about the people; they do not care if the public has to wait for care. Waiting becomes the doctor's fault. This same scenario against doctors is played in the USA and other countries of the world. The Dutch are not alone. When patients from Holland go to nearby Belgium for care, which is more accessible, doctors in Holland respond by providing more customer-friendly care to keep the patients in Holland so as to not lose the reimbursement for treatment to their competitors in Belgium. Competition does lower costs and produce more service! That is what Capitalism and free competition do. Socialism produces a lack of incentive and higher costs as it takes more people to provide the same service a free market ensures. That is what we saw and heard. Socialism does not seem to be working in healthcare in Holland either. On further discussion, the doctors admit they need help in public relations and in organizing as a group. They need leadership, a call we hear in other countries including the USA. Health care costs in Holland are rising. I wonder why? Do the people have any responsibility for their own health? Who is responsible for these rising costs: the individual citizen, industry, doctors, politicians, or all of the above? But each is blaming the other for the rising costs everywhere in the world. 5.3. Belgium In Belgium, we read and saw that the costs of the healthcare system, which is a combination of government support and fee for service private care, are rising. In the past 5 years the National Health Insurance Fund has increased spending 800%. A number of actions have been taken by the government to reduce these costs by closing hospitals, reducing payments to university hospitals and payments for dialysis, etc [38]. Most of the care is private and is based on government-negotiated rates for service [24], [25]. Hospitals are reimbursed by a combination of disease-related payments and fee for service. The costs per person for healthcare in Belgium are the highest in Europe representing 9% of the GDP of that country; the quality is excellent [25]. In a survey conducted in 2004, doctors in Belgium were dissatisfied with the bureaucratic system, low pay, lack of family life, and the hedonistic culture of patients who were only interested in themselves [26]. The illegal immigrants are stressing its healthcare system [27]. (Sound familiar?) Many are losing healthcare coverage as the Belgian companies fail in the international competitive market place [25]. (Shades of India, 2 centuries ago.) The increasing numbers of aging people and growth of the “boomers,” the post World War II babies now reaching 40 to 60 years old, are concerns for the health systems in Belgium, China, Japan, other European countries, and the USA [25]. Patient copayment for healthcare and disease-based reimbursement of hospitals in Belgium have not reduced the rising costs of care [25]. The number of doctors and healthcare workers in Belgium has doubled or tripled in the last years to high ratios to population compared with the rest of Europe. Malpractice suits are on the rise. There are no easy answers here either. But one neurosurgeon, Jacques Brotchi, is trying to solve these problems by becoming involved in politics. Nothing will change unless doctors become involved like Jacques. 5.4. Peru While we were on the way to England from Belgium, the newspapers reported the extradition of Alberto Fujimori, former President of Peru, from Chile back to Peru. Although Fujimori had brought an end to political violence and stimulated economic growth in Peru in the 1990s, he was accused of becoming an authoritarian leader, of dissolving Parliament, and of corruption. He resigned in 2000 when he was in Japan and out of Peru, an example of the character of the person [29]. The Peruvian government wanted him back in Peru for trial for his crimes. This political leadership is another example of Orwell's Animal Farm “All pigs are equal…” 5.5. England We next went to London, England. The new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, gave his first address to the public while we were there. He was raised in a minister's family on the ethics of “hard work, doing the right thing, and treating everyone with respect” as he said. He stated that, “Everyone should rise as far as their talents can take them and then the talents of each of us should contribute to the well being of all.” This is the basic dictum of Socialism. Who determines that everyone is doing his/her best and who should give to others? Of course, the government and the politicians. He said, “I stand for a Britain where we expect responsibility at every level of society” [30]. Who determines that responsibility? Does that apply to politicians also? Two of his government Ministers, a husband and wife, were accused of abusing government reimbursement to pay for their two homes the day before he spoke. He said, “Up against the competition of 2 billion people in China and India, we need to unlock all the talent we have. We cannot afford to waste talent…” [30]. Where did the incentive of the people go? Or was everyone waiting for the next person to “contribute to their well being”? Did the socialistic systems deprive them of that incentive that we also saw lost in other places in Europe and that the French Prime Minister's associate said were “bankrupting France”? Did socialism compromise the healthcare in Holland that caused people to cross borders from Holland to Belgium for care? Isn't the same cross-border migration for healthcare occurring from Canada to the USA? Prime Minister Brown wanted to have 12 months of paid maternity leave from work and a number of other reforms, although he offered no solution for their payment. More government entitlements are coming in Britain. Who will pay for them? Will the end result be the loss of competition seen in France in the world markets and a declining economy and “bankruptcy”? Is this a politician buying votes as we have seen in the USA? Will anyone stand up and say we cannot give everything to everyone? The following morning The Daily Telegraph, Wednesday September 26, 2007, reported on its front page that the government is now establishing guidelines for women in childbirth. “Too many women are getting Caesarian sections and epidurals to prevent pain,” the government stated. Home birth should be advocated. “Midwives and obstetricians should only intervene if there are problems.” There is also a shortage of midwives the paper stated. Their reasons are based on the need to save expenditure in a socialistic healthcare system that is not working. (Didn't we hear this from the politicians as we left the USA on our trip?) The government is clearly practicing medicine. How did that happen? Where were the doctors to protest this intrusion into the freedom of individuals to choose what they want in their life? Or do the doctors feel helpless to influence the course of healthcare in socialized systems? What do all of these observations mean for American medicine as the politicians push the country toward a socialized system? The financial crisis that we saw when we left 18 days before was now shaking England with the failure of Northern Rock Bank. Greed knows no bounds. 6. Iran and Islam  On the day before we left England for home, President Ahmadinejad of Iran addressed the UN General Assembly in New York and spoke at Columbia University. There he quoted from the Qur'an as he spoke and interpreted how Muhammad had encouraged teaching, scholarship, and investigation. He praised academic freedom but stated that “only a pure scholar and researcher, free from wrong ideologies, superstitions, selfishness, and material trappings can discover the reality.” (Who determines what person's beliefs are wrong ideologies and what is that reality?) He went on to say, “Science and wisdom can be misused, a misuse caused by selfishness, corruption, material desires and material interests…Corrupted independent human beings resist acceptance of reality, even if they do accept it, they do not obey it…Scientists and scholars are misused for personal, group, or party interests…Ruling powers are misusing many scholars and scientists in different fields, with the purpose of stripping nations of their wealth…” [32]. These statements are more of the same rhetoric. Who makes all these judgments? Certainly not the individual but most certainly a few in power in the government. This is how an authoritarian government operates, dictating what should be done to others. Unfortunately, President Ahmadinejad wants people in all countries to adopt this system of values, behavior, and government based on a very strict interpretation of the Qur'an. Yet, how can one justify the killing of innocent people, the abuse of women, the use of children for sacrifice, the arming of terrorists worldwide that occurs in Iran? That is his interpretation of the Qur'an, and he can justify any action from it as indicated above. Those are not the principles of freedom and governments established by the Magna Carta in England in 1215 and the Declaration of Independence in the USA in 1776 [33]. 7. Islamic history  Islam began with Muhammad in the 600s and grew to one of the great civilizations of the world in the next 1300 years making many excellent contributions in art, science, and scholarship that have benefited civilizations all over the world. In the history of Islam, separate sects have quarreled and fought wars with each other for the right to be the caliphate, or leaders of the Muslim world. In the 1700s a very orthodox sect arose in what is now Saudi Arabia to promote a return to the true values of Muhammad. This is the Wahhabi sect established in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which has supported this literal interpretation of the Qur'an for the last 300 plus years. It is from this sect that Osama Bin Laden arose. This literal interpretation of the Qur'an is the basis of the beliefs of Ahmadinejad and his associates. But the world of today is not the world of 600 AD [34]. It is now 1400 years later. We have gone through cultural, social, artistic, and scientific revolutions during that time. There are new changes occurring every day. We live in a world of differing viewpoints, as I mentioned at the beginning. We are different; no one person is better than the other. We have different cultures and beliefs. There must be room for all to exist, for no one group of people or their culture is better than the other. That is the problem today when one culture plans to exterminate another. In today's world when we have the power of ultimate destruction of humanity, we need to find solutions to this coexistence. 8. Myanmar (Burma)  As our plane traveled through the air to land in the USA, 100 000 people, mostly monks, peacefully marched in the streets of Myanmar, formerly Burma, to protest the rule of the military junta that has ruled the country since 1962 [36], [37]. This regime has been repressive, denying free speech and the results of free elections. Protestors were shot during this recent march. 9. Conclusion  What we saw and heard in 18 days is a microcosm of the evolution of human civilization. From the repressive government of Myanmar, to the fundamentalist policies of Iran, to the liberalization of freedoms in China from communism, to the socialist and capitalistic democracies of Europe and the USA, it is obvious that the individual is the best person to decide his/her future. As Will and Ariel Durant have described in their book, The Lessons of History, dictatorships, monarchies, socialistic, and democratic governments have all survived at periods in history and have been successful in providing for the people [35]. I used to say that democracy is unstoppable, but I have seen that any form of government including democracy can be corrupted. We found corruption every place we went from the USA to China, Japan, Europe, and England. The Durants state that corruption has been present throughout the history of humankind and is probably less now than in previous centuries [35]. We saw greed everywhere, which has gone on for centuries. Yet, what is unstoppable is the desire for people to be free and to decide what they want to do with their own lives. We heard this from the young Chinese, and it is obviously the desire of the European and American civilizations in modern times. We have heard this desire for freedom and opportunity in small gatherings of government officials and successful professionals in Egypt and have seen it in the middle and lower classes in South America. We have heard it in Russia and in Romania, both part of the Communist empire in the 20th century. The Durants said in their book, “Democracy is the most difficult of all governments as it requires the widest spread of intelligence.” They state, “Democracy has done less harm, and more good than any other form of government…If equality of educational opportunity can be established, democracy will be real and justified…If our economy of freedom fails to distribute wealth as ably as it has created it, the road to dictatorship will be open to any man who can persuasively promise security to all…” [35]. 10. The message for physicians  So, what is the meaning of all of this to physicians and neurosurgeons? In the late 19th and early 20th century, physicians in various parts of the world, including Harvey Cushing as a neurosurgeon, actively defined the role of medicine and its practice as a profession and politically by establishing its principles. These were true leaders in our civilizations. But now, in all the countries we visited including the USA, physicians have become passive, only reacting to the changes in medicine thrust upon them by governments. As typified by the Dutch and as is true in all other countries we have visited over the years, many physicians do not realize that they have options in directing healthcare politically so that the people benefit the most. This has been the commitment of physicians from the beginning of time, devotion to the patient. Although this is a high ideal, one must face the reality of limited finances in various societies rich and poor, the lack of responsibility of the public for their individual health, particularly if it is under government control, entitlements, and other factors. As Tuncalp Ozgen stated, doctors have a responsibility to society and cannot live in the vacuum of the operating room. We must be aware of the forces on all of society. Yet, to vacate our responsibility to politicians to determine the healthcare of a nation is in fact a violation of our commitment to our patients—to care for their health. This commitment can be done individually as some doctors have done in many countries of the world by participating in the political process, or by groups of doctors uniting for this purpose either with or without their medical societies. Yes, just as we plan and approach a patient's medical problem, the political issues can be diagnosed and treated properly by doctors who are skilled at dealing with all kinds of problems every day. The Durants say that history records “the exceptional because it is interesting.” But there are millions of people who are living good lives and doing good things every day and their deeds go unnoticed among the exceptional events that grab the attention of the media [35]. Doctors need to be among those people who make a more visible contribution to society because that is the only way we can preserve the purity of the profession of medicine for our patients. There may not be one answer for all cultures, but the question is “Can we make it better?” From everything we saw and heard, the answer is “Yes.” References  [1]. [1]Myth: number of uninsured requires government healthcare solutions. http://www.myheritage.org/Issues/MythBusters/HealthUninsured.asp. [2]. [2]Loosing our Census. http://epaper.investors.com/Default/Scritping/ArticleWin.asp?From...=IBD/2007/033/30&pageLabel=A14&entityld=Ar01401&ViewMode=HTML&GZ=T. [3]. [3]Medicare bankruptcy date moved up 7 years. http://www.aapsonline.org/nod/newsofday53.htm. [4]. [4]Subprime mortgage financial crisis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_financial_crisis2007;. [5]. [5]Crisis deepens for Northern Rock. Int Her Trib. 2007;. [6]. [6]Whitesides J. Bush, Congress at record low ratings: Reuters poll. Reuters. 2007;. [7]. [7]Abe S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinzo_Abe. [8]. [8]Fackler M. Japanese housewives sweat in secret as markets reel. N Y Times. 2007;. [9]. [9]Chanda N. Bound together: How traders, preachers, adventurers, and warriors shaped globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2007;. [10]. [10]MacLeod C. China admits tainted food link. USA Today. 2007;. [11]. [11]Toy maker in dead end after recalls. China Daily. 2007;. [12]. [12]Mattel issues new massive China toy recall. Assoc Press. 2007;. [13]. [13]Mattel apologizes to China over recalls. Assoc Press. 2007;. [14]. [14]UN Looks to China Wind Farms to Ease Carbon Dispute (Update1) Jim Efstathiou Jr. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aVWJ5E71BDtE&refer=home. [15]. [15]Spencer J. China pays steep price as textile exports boom. Wall Street J. 2007;. [16]. [16]Dougherty C. Inflation lurking on global Horizon. Int Her Trib. 2007;. [17]. [17]Andrews EL, Sanger DE. Greenspan book laments course of Bush and G.O.P. N Y Times. 2007;. [18]. [18]Nearly 2,000 Chinese officials confess wrong doings. People's Daily Online. 2007;http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90785/6230495.html. [19]. [19]Samuel H. French PM Fillon tells farmers 'France is broke'. http//www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtm...CFGGAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/09/24/wfra124.xml&site=5&page=0. [20]. [20]Sarkozy announces crunch pension reform (it's a question of fairness). http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/18998457/posts. [21]. [21]Ausman JI. Random thoughts on the life on other planets, traffic fatalities, and how socialized medicine is working worldwide. Surg Neurol. 2007;68:239–241. Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (102 KB)
|
CrossRef
[22]. [22]Corruption scandals in the Paris region. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_scandals_in_the_Paris_region. [23]. [23]Orwell G. Animal Farm. London: Secher and Warburg; 1945;. [24]. [24]Speeches & Remarks: USA-BE: Same Problems, Different solutions—The growth of aging populations; a challenge for health systems. http://belgium-usembassy.-gov/usa-be_healthcare_systems_conference.html. [25]. [25]Highlights on health, Belgium 2004; Health System. http://www.euro.who.int/eprise/main/who/progs/chhbel/system/20050307_1. [26]. [26]Deliege D. The opinions of Belgian physicians about their practice. Cah Sociol Demogr Med. 2004;44:443–506. MEDLINE [27]. [27]Medicine Sans Frontieres. press Release 7/13/2004. Access denied in the Belgian Healthcare system. http://www.msf.org/msfinternational/invoke.cfm?objectid=35BC61EC-B...-945B2D2139D4CB3D&component=toolkit.pressrelease&method=full_html. [28]. [28]French Revolution. Wall Street J. 2007;http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB11902527164173388.html. [29]. [29]Fujimori A. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Fujimori. [30]. [30]Gordon Brown's Speech in full. http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7010664.stm. [31]. [31]Fukuda voted new Japanese prime minister. http://www.guardian.co.uk/japan/story/0,,2176686.00.html. [32]. [32]Iran's President at Columbia University—a transcript. http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/printDS/202820. [33]. [33]Magna Carta. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta. [34]. [34]Muslim History. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_history. [35]. [35]Durant W, Durant A. The Lessons of History. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1968;. [36]. [36]Myanmar Monks defy junta, set up marches. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyid=14682058. [37]. [37]Myanmar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki?myanmar. [38]. [38]Health care crisis continues for most European countries. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/ml_m3570is_n12_v19/ai_19002744/print. PII: S0090-3019(07)01190-1 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2007.10.005 © 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc. | |
|