Surgical Neurology
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 330-335, October 2009

Long term clinical outcome of peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain

  • Frank Van Calenbergh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 16 34 42 90; fax: +32 16 34 42 85.
  • ,
  • Jan Gybels, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Koen Van Laere, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Patrick Dupont, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Leon Plaghki, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unité READ, Faculty of Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bart Depreitere, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Ron Kupers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • PET Center & Department of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark

Received 8 October 2008; accepted 4 March 2009. published online 10 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Chronic neuropathic pain after injury to a peripheral nerve is known to be resistant to treatment. Peripheral nerve stimulation is one of the possible treatment options, which is, however, not performed frequently. In recent years we have witnessed a renewed interest for PNS. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of PNS in a group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain treated with PNS since the 1980s.

Methods

Of an original series of 11 patients, 5 patients could be invited for clinical examination, detailed assessment of clinical pain and QST examination. The assessments were done both during habitual use of PNS and with the stimulator off.

Results

Average pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings as assessed with visual analog and verbal rating scales showed significant beneficial effects of PNS. Quality of life measures (sleep and daily functioning) also showed positive effects. Quantitative Sensory Testing results did not show significant differences in cold pain and heat pain thresholds between the “ON” and “OFF” conditions.

Conclusion

In selected patients with peripheral neuropathic pain PNS remains effective even after more than 20 years.

Abbreviations: DCS, dorsal column stimulation, PNS, peripheral nerve stimulation, QST, Quantitative Sensory Testing, VAS, visual analog scales

Keywords: Pain, Peripheral nerve stimulation, Chronic neuropathic pain, Quantitative Sensory Testing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grants from Medtronic, the Svend Andersen Foundation, and the Lunbeck Foundation.

PII: S0090-3019(09)00259-6

doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.006

Refers to article:

  • Commentary , 10 August 2009

    Ron Pawl
    Surgical Neurology October 2009 (Vol. 72, Issue 4, Page 335)

Surgical Neurology
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 330-335, October 2009